For and Against Calvinism

I loved reading both of these books. According to the Myers-Briggs, my personality type is "The Debater" (ENTP). Because I do love debating, these books suited me well. Each presented their interpretation of the biblical text in regards to the Doctrines of Grace often referred to as "The Five points of Calvinism" which are: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. Authors Michael Horton and Roger Olson provided very engaging reads. I had a pen in hand at all times and took MANY notes in both books. Each of the authors provided succinct arguments that helped me think through what I believe regarding Calvinism. Both are written on an introductory level, so they are a good fit for anyone who is interested in the topic.

I will admit that I went into reading these as a self-proclaimed "Calvinist," but I did my best to remain an objective reader without letting my bias effect my reading. Whether my preconceived notions drastically effected me, I can't say, but I found myself agreeing with Horton (For Calvinism) much more often than I did Olsen (Against Calvinism). One critique I would make is that the Olson book is "Against Calvinism" and not "For Arminianism." He spent the entire book on the offensive, but never really demonstrated the superiority of his own view: a fact that I believe greatly hindered his effectiveness in persuading. If you're curious about Calvinism, check these books out. I insist that if you choose to read one, commit to reading both and try to withhold judgement until both present their full arguments.